Doug's Conference Blog

Doug's Conference Blog

Doug Belshaw  //  My main blog is at dougbelshaw.com/blog. I use Posterous for my FAQ, Conference blog and Ideas Garden. :-)

Jan 26 / 9:06pm

Learning Without Frontiers 2012 (#LWF12)

(download)

Introduction
It was my second, this time successful, attempt to attend the Learning Without Frontiers Conference. Last year I had a ticket but my daughter rather tardily decided to enter the world on the same day that I was supposed to be in London. How inconsiderate. ;-)

This year, however, was a different story: I was not only able to attend the conference but ran a workshop entitled Education for the Apocalypse? with Keri Facer. Keri is Professor of Education at Manchester Metropolitan University and delivered a fantastic talk on the main stage at #LWF12. 

Learning Without Frontiers is one of those conferences that creates a real buzz both on-and-offline and, to a some extent, sets the agenda for educational technology for the year. I think it's important before going any further to deal with the issue of cost. The tickets were expensive - extremely expensive but did include a free iPad 2. As a workshop speaker, however, I didn't get (or need) one.

The Festival that runs alongside the conference is completely free of charge, the live stream is free and the tweets coming from conference delegates is free. Graham Brown-Martin's done a fantastic job in getting people to pay that amount of money whilst providing such a great free option, but I do wonder whether he's torpedoed his own conference. Knowing Graham, I doubt it - and it certainly works out well for teachers who can get in for free!

Day 1
Noam Chomsky kicked off #LWF12 with a pre-recorded video from his office at MIT. I smiled with delight as I saw that the first thing he talked about was 'the purpose of education'. For the record he believes that it's to do with Enlightenment values. I wonder if I could convince Graham to let us use that video on the Purpos/ed website? I didn't agree with everything Chomsky said ("technology is neutral"?!) and it went on about a minute too long, but it was well-shot and a high-profile start to the conference.

I can't say the same about Ray Kurzweil's session. He spent what seemed like an eternity rambling about his career whilst displaying the first slide and then whizzed through a generic slide deck. I can only remember the word 'exponential'. Oh, and just talked to the camera the whole time. The next session by the interim CEO of Apps for Good was very worthy but, in contrast to Kurzweil, seemed to speed by without me being able to take much in. Too much coffee? 

Thankfully, the next section of Day 1 at #LWF12 was much better. Ellen MacArthur gave an extremely slick and well-argued plea to get behind the 'circle economy' that her foundation is promoting; Keri Facer explained why we need to work together to collaborate for social change. These were the two best talks on Day 1 for me. Jaron Lanier was interesting but I didn't learn much apart from the story of his life and that he plays 10,000 year-old rather random (and awful-sounding) instruments. The guy from the GSMA was poor: it was if he'd watched a couple of TED Talks and read the Guardian to cobble together a presentation.

I skipped the afternoon session on Day 1 to catch up with people like my good friend Nick DennisDai BarnesHelen Keegan, and others. I used to feel a bit guilt about doing this at conferences, but it's important to maintain and sustain relationships, I think. The Education for the Apocalypse session Keri and I ran from 5pm to 6.30pm was standing room only and had a great atmosphere. It's definitely one we'll have to run again. The evening I spent in the fantastic company of Nick Dennis and Catherine Cronin at Pizza Express.

Day 2
As a father to a 5 year-old boy and a 1 year-old daughter, sleep is an important commodity to me but sometimes a rare one. It surprised me, therefore, to be more tired despite getting a greater number of hours of sleep at my hotel. But then I never sleep that well when I'm away from home. 

Upon arriving at #LWF12 for Day 2 the queue for the cloakroom was immense. I managed to talk to the legend that is Dan Sutch for about two minutes during this time. I really must pin that man down to a time and a place for several pints.

Thankfully, I only missed the first part of Lord David Puttnam's introduction. I respect the man greatly but still don't agree with his argument that keyboards are on the way out. Until we can parse audio and video as easily as text, the latter will remain the dominant means of communication online.

Lord Puttnam introduced a fantastic trio of talks: 
I caught Lisa Ma's crazy, crazy session about Cat Ladies and parasites and 'learning from the fringes'. There's some properly out there people in the world. She's one of them (in a good way!) 

Whilst I wanted to hear Jesse Schell talk about gamification I had a lunch meeting with Grainne Hamilton from RSC Scotland and a couple of people from the Scottish Qualifications Authority (including Joe Wilson) to talk about Open Badges. It's looking promising.

In the afternoon I enjoyed, as ever, Stephen Heppell's presentation about the wonderful potential of technologies and learners taking control and then Francis Gilbert's polemic about the way in which the way the current UK education system is leads to problems. He discussed everything from Ofsted to the ways in which we don't learn from what works. Both were great talks which cut through some of the fluffy stuff.

I'd promised Alec Patton from the Innovation Unit that I'd come to his session on Getting Your School Engaged but, because the main room was out of sync with the festival, arrived late. I still got to talk through some issues around project-based learning with some teachers, so all was not lost.

Before leaving, I had a quick chat with Mark Surman about the DML Conference 2012 which we're both attending, said goodbye to a few people, and then headed for a pint to continue the conversation with Alec. From there, I successfully managed to navigate the London Underground system to catch my train home which, for anyone who knows me well, is no mean feat. ;-)

Conclusion
I greatly enjoyed #LWF12. Some of the well-known speakers were disappointing, yes, but the majority were informative, engaging and presenting from a solid research basis. As ever, however, it's the people who make a conference worth going to. It's the conversations and the networking.

A note to conference organisers to finish off. It is not acceptable to use coffee and lunch breaks as buffers. If you do this, people will simply stop attending some of the blocks of sessions. Stick to timings. Be ruthless. It makes for a better experience for everyone!

Posted from United Kingdom

Comments (0)

Nov 17 / 8:12pm

Guardian Innovation in Education (#IIE2011)

(download)

I spent today at the Guardian Innovation in Education event at Prospero House, London. It was the first time I've chaired a session or spoken on a keynote panel (you can read about what I spoke about here and there's a pre-conference interview here).

 

It was a day of two halves, really. The programme promised much in the morning, but it was only Mick Waters, former head of the QCDA that stirred things up and said things that had people nodding heads, sending out tweets and writing things down. The session on leadership I thought was particularly awkward as the panel had little or no experience of being in such a position. Thankfully, the session chair Russell Hobby from the National Association of Head Teachers was able to step in with some pertinent points.

 

I had a similar feeling of being short-changed in the session entitled Innovation in workforce development: the importance of teacher training and supported professional development to empower teachers to innovate. The panel didn't have enough breadth of experience (or specific examples of good practice) to give us any meat.

 

Thankfully, the conference organization, the venue and the afternoon session were all great. I chaired a session featuring an eclectic mix of speakers from games designers to academics which seemed to go down well. At least I kept everyone to time! Lord David Puttnam was fantastic in his keynote, teasing out issues in the education system. I asked him the Q&A what he believed to be the purpose(s) of education He replied that he considers it to be all about helping people to optimise their talents and feel 'successful' (which gives them confidence). Puttnam recounted the story of an American journalist he knows who was in London during the August riots. He found our youth to be 'fearful' and wishing to live 'normal lives'. How sad.

 

Apart from David Puttnam's keynote, the session I enjoyed most was Best practice: Showcasing the benefits and challenges of adopting innovative technologies in education. This featured a couple of people of whom I was already aware (Ollie Bray, Abdul Chohan) and two that I wasn't (Simon Elledge, Martin Palfrey). They shared with us their successes and failures at the 'coalface' implementing learning technologies. I think a lot of people went away with ideas from that session.

 

The final session was the keynote panel discussion of which I was part. This ended up, after much shuffling over the last few weeks, comprising Ian Fordham (Education Foundation), Douglas Archibald (Whole Education) and me. I very much appreciated Douglas' suggestion to the conference organizers that people had 15 minutes to talk to one another on their tables, with a truncated Q&A session at the end of the day.

 

Overall, then, a success for the Guardian in attracting big names (Google was a 'knowledge partner, they got David Puttnam to keynote) and in some fantastic conference organisation. A little more thought about who they get for which sessions next time might be prudent. Thankfully, the feedback form champagne draw took place before the keynote panel session ended, meaning people (probably) didn't have a chance to rate me...

Comments (0)

Nov 5 / 12:21pm

#MozFest (Mozilla Festival 2011)

(download)

I spent last weekend at the Mozilla Festival at Ravensbourne College in Greenwich, London. The main reason I decided to give up a weekend with my family to attend yet another conference was because it wasn't just another conference. Although I felt slightly out of my depth on the technical front (I'm no programmer) I'm excited about Mozilla moving into the education space.

Of course, being Mozilla, they're not perpetuating the same old paradigm and are, in the words of CEO Mark Surman, 'going big' on learning. If you haven't seen their Open Badges architecture (and the associated DML Competition) you haven't been paying attention. Education is driven, for better or for worse by assessment, so providing alternatives for the latter allows us to more easily change the former. I'm certainly fully signed-up for evangelising and exploring badges, as you've probably noticed if you've read my main blog recently!

But back to the Festival. It's difficult to sum up how an event makes you feel: it's of course possible to list and describe, as I shall below, the sessions and what happened, but portraying the well of positivity is difficult. "More hack, less yack" was the order of the day, with a distinctly Californian can-do attitude taking over that particular corner of the Greenwich Peninsula for three days. It's also tough to explain how, in what I'm increasingly realising is Mozilla's modus operandi, the whole event was extremely well-organised yet allowed for flexibility and spontaneity. Saturday and Sunday ostensibly started at 9am, yet didn't start until around 9.45am on Sunday. But still, everything was fine and no-one panicked. Awesome.

Another example of the can-do yet laid-back approach of organisers and delegates was exemplified in the first session I attended on Saturday. It was on paper-based prototyping, which I'd seen briefly on Friday at The Hive session for teenagers. For whatever reason, the person who was supposed to be leading the session didn't appear. At other conferences where something similar has happened one of two things has happened: either delegates wait around for someone to come along, or they simply leave. There must have been around twenty-five people in the session and I didn't see one of them leave. Given we had a stack of paper, I suggested we start with a paper aeroplane competition. And we just made things up from there.

I went to a couple of sessions relating to badges, one on Saturday and one on Sunday. I knew most of the stuff discussed at the first session, stepping in to help Carla Casilli (@cc_open) and Brian Brennan (@brianloveswords) explain the concept to those encountering it for the first time. The second was more enlightening in the sense that it was more of a case study of how one organization, the Digital Youth Network (DYN), have thought through how to introduce a badge ecosystem in their work with teenagers. There's a couple of PDFs they put up on the screen that I'll be chasing them to make available online.

On Saturday afternoon I attended a session entitled: 'Open, Participatory and Fun: Working the Mozilla Way'. Gervase Markham (@gerv) facilitated this session in a way in alignment with these principles, getting us to think through in groups what makes for successful projects. As it turned out, our group focused on a non-web idea of an 'internet-free zone' in rural France. Gerv steered us towards the following things that he suggested every project needs (and which I'll be talking with Andy Stewart for soon to check that we're on top of for Purpos/ed):

  1. Written, archived, searchable, asynchronous discussion (e.g. mailing list, newsgroup or forum)
  2. Work product storage and versioning (e.g. source code management system or wiki)
  3. Information and announcements (e.g. website or blog)
  4. Problem/task tracker (e.g. issue tracker)

We were reminded that every project has a 'presumed level of knowledge' and that it is our job to enable meaningful participation. Amen to that.

Two more sessions. First, I went to 'HTML5 and Other New Technologies Explained for Humans' which was an exteremely well-attended presentation by Christian Heilmann (@codepo8). He not only presented using HTML5 but explained it in a way I could understand and potentially use. The 'grab bag' for the session is available here. Unfortunately, the same couldn't be said for the extremely enthusiastic but ultimately-unsuccessful session on the Storify API I attended afterwards - which is a shame as I really like (and use) Storify.

I still haven't mentioned the amazon barista-created coffee, the Firefox walk-around mascots, the amazingness of the venue or the people I bumped into. Oh well, this semi-braindump will have to suffice for the time being...

Comments (1)

Oct 7 / 10:12am

JISC Digital Literacy workshop (#jiscdiglit)

(download)

As part of the programme support for the new JISC Developing Digital Literacies programme (and with this being the area of my thesis) I felt I pretty much had to attend at least one of the series of workshops that have been held over the last few months. I couldn't attend previous ones due to other commitments, but the one today in Bristol fell conveniently between programme startup meetings in Birmingham and the Future of Technology in Education event (#FOTE11) in London tomorrow.

The day was expertly led by Helen Beetham, long-time JISC consultant and well-known for her work in the digital literacies arena. She was ably supported by representatives from projects and institutions, as well as from Paul Bailey, joint Programme Manager (with Sarah Knight) for the JISC Developing Digital Literacies programme.

Although it wasn't addressed explicitly, something that interested me was the slight difference in emphasis between 'literacy' in the workshop documentation and the discussion of literacies (plural) on the day. The latter is also the focus of the Developing Digital Literacies programme. I've had slight misgivings about JISC's work in this area (see Chapter 7 of my thesis) but, thankfully, recognising literacies in their plurality whilst foregrounding their very contextual and situated nature seems to be a feature of JISC's work going forward. :-)

I suppose that, because although I'm based in a university but not really *part* of it, the target audience for the workshop didn't really include me. I find the theoretical and conceptual side of it more interesting that the implementation, to be honest. To that end, I enjoyed seeing again Helen's developmental framework based on stages of development.

Hb_digilit_framework

Helen's point is that the top of this hierarchy is bound up with identity whereas the bottom is more around ownership (Beetham & Sharpe, 2009).

Another thing I really liked was the way in which a 'ways of knowing' approach was used in the workshop. Instead of getting hung-up on endless arguments about definitions of digital literacies, focusing on how people can and do know things is much more productive. As I've argued elsewhere, there's more than is commonly recognised and/or admitted in education around habits, dispositions and attitudes.

During the poster session towards the end an interesting picture emerged. Those posters representing projects to do with capital expenditure such as new library spaces were shown to be things that delegates' institutions had or were in the process of doing. On the other hand, those around curriculum design were avoided. There's a real need, then, for the JISC Developing Digital Literacies programme and, perhaps more importantly, disseminating the outputs effectively.

One fantastic surprise at the workshop was when Zak Mensah arrived with a FedEx box. The wonderful Helen Keegan (@heloukee), with whom I'd been having a discussion on Twitter about the severe lack of cake at my thesis submission, sent cupcakes with my face imprinted on the icing! What a legend. :-D

Comments (0)

Sep 28 / 7:15pm

Mobile Learning: Now and the Future (#mobilelearn2011)

(download)

I've had a great day today at the College of North West London at an event entitled Mobile Learning: Now and the Future. I thought it was going to be quite a small affair, but it ended up attracting names such as John Cook and John Traxler to keynote, so was a pretty big deal in this field!

Steve Boneham from JISC Netskills and I presented on Implementing Mobile Learning in Your Institution which, due to numbers, we delivered in the main auditorium and seemed to be well-received. It was good to see familiar faces such as Geoff Stead, Nick Dennis, Julie Usher and Claire Bradley. 

Afterwards, I ended up going for a Turkish meal with John Moore, his PhD student Sujan, Julie Usher, Nick Dennis and Shirley (I didn't catch her surname) from the University of Greenwich. Great stuff. :-)

 

Comments (0)

Sep 24 / 8:57am

Scottish Learning Festival 2011 (#SLF11)

(download)

For the past three years I've had the opportunity and privilege to attend the Scottish Learning Festival. At the first one I attended in 2009 I was still Director of e-Learning at a large Academy in Northumberland but, even so, I was only grudgingly allowed to go. Thankfully, my enlightened boss in my current role (not directly related to schools) has allowed me to go for the past two years. :-D

Unlike BETT, the Scottish Learning Festival is not primarily a trade show - although it does feature the largest example of the latter in Scotland. It's first and foremost a vehicle for Education Scotland (previously three separate bodies) to showcase and share great educational practice. There are liberal helpings of both pupils and international delegates at the event, held at the SECC in Glasgow. 

For the past five years there's been a TeachMeet associated with the Scottish Learning Festival which, if I'm honest, has been my main reason for going. The things I've learned over the past couple of years at those TeachMeets eclipsed what I learned at the Learning Festival itself. That wasn't the case this year. Why? OK, so the TeachMeet (the slickest and best-organised and sponsored I've attended) had less actual classroom practitioners presenting, but that wasn't the reason. The reason was because of the sheer quality of the sessions I attended at the Scottish Learning Festival:

Slide to Unlock
In this session, Kate Farrell (@digitalkatie) demonstrated the revolutionary potential of the iPad for learners with disabilities. Her son has an undiagnosed condition meaning he cannot stand up or talk. The equipment that is usually used to help him communicate runs into thousands of pounds, but Kate has found apps for the iPad that improve upon that specialised system. She argued that these apps were equally good for younger learners (which interested me, having a 4 year-old and 8 month-old!)

Kate's slides (with lots of useful ideas) can be found at http://slideshare.net/digitalkatie

Improving an entire school system
This keynote by Prof Ben Levin focused on the importance of not just focusing on individual schools or local authorities, but upon entire education systems. He made some persuasive arguments against giving schools more autonomy (in the sense of 'doing what they like') which he criticised England for doing with Free Schools and Academies. Central to his message was the issue of 'alignment' - of getting agreement from the public, from educators and from senior leaders on what is permissible within a given context. 

What was missing, I felt, was any kind of notion that what is currently being assessed in schools can be subjected to critique. As I commented to a few people (and on Twitter) I wish I had as much conviction about something that Ben Levin has about the importance of data!

The Future is not what it was
I'm not very into 'motivational' keynote speakers, but Sir John Jones (whom I'd never heard of before this week, unlike Ben Levin) moved me to my feet to join in the standing ovation after his session. OK, so some of the stories he used may have been 'borrowed' or a composite. OK, so he talked in slogans some of the time, but his core message that 'teaching cannot be separated from caring' was powerful, relevant and timely. The man had such obvious passion and enthusiasm for helping young people (he was previously a Headteacher in Liverpool) that you couldn't help be affected. Great stuff.

TeachMeet SLF (#TMSLF11)
I greatly enjoyed the format and fantastic organisation of the TeachMeet at this year's Scottish Learning Festival. It was organised by others than the usual suspects and, primarily, by Primary teachers (hence the detail!)  I signed up to do a two-minute presentation on the new Change MOOC (Massive Open Online Course) that started last week and, because it was mentioned in a presentation prior to mine, a bit about Purpos/ed as well.

This isn't a criticism as such, but there weren't many actual, real teachers talking about what they've been up to in the classroom recently at the TeachMeet. You can only work with what you've got, and those (few) that signed up to do a presentation were people like Joe Dale, John Johnston and Derek Robertson. They're all fantastic educators, but they hardly need encouraging to do a presentation! I'd like to see more work behind-the-scenes to get teachers involved rather than being in the audience.

Another not-really-a-criticism was the slickness of the event. Sponsors were mentioned in between every presentation, the whole event was livestreamed, and the organisation was seamless. That's all great, but I doubt any teacher in attendance for the first time would feel like they could go away and run a TeachMeet. Sometimes, a bit more of a 'rustic', haphazard approach works wonders. ;-)

After the TeachMeet there was a TeachEat where I got a chance to chat to the wonder that is Jen Deyenberg. Fresh from the Nokia Coast-to-Coast challenge (running, cycling, kayaking) she helped organise the TeachMeet and is going to organise Unplug'd Scotland next - after a successful similar event in her native Canada. Some people's energy astounds me!

Breakfast with Derek Robertson
I met Derek Robertson in the lift on the way down to breakfast. He's an internationally-renowned advocate of games-based learning (a term he told me is sometimes 'unhelpful') through his work with the Consolarium. We talked about all sorts of things and I got up from breakfast with a list of books and websites to look at hastily scribbled onto a napkin. 

Educating for the Unknown
This was probably the best session I went to at the Scottish Learning Festival this year. It was based on the Teaching for Understanding framework which was the result of Gardner and Perkins' work on Project Zero. The session was introduced by someone from Education Scotland who has been working with local authorities and teachers getting them to study towards a Harvard module on the TfU framework. This was followed by teachers who have put the TfU framework into practice, going through the four key ideas of:

1. Generative topics
2. Understanding goals
3. Performances of understanding
4. Ongoing assessment

It was obvious that the TfU framework works and that it's transformed those teachers' educational practice. Well worth looking at more closely.

BOULTS - Developing the potential to think and learn
Had I not been to the TfU session (see above) I would have probably thought this session was even better than 'good'. As it was, although the 'pick and mix' approach to pedagogy involved such luminaries as De Bono, Bloom and Simister it was, by their own admission, quite difficult to implement. Still, delegates were given plenty of resources to go away with and read (which is always helpful)

Conclusion
In between these sessions I wandered around the trade show, drank coffee and talked to people. The Scottish Learning Festival is *exactly* what it should be: uplifting, pedagogically-sound and free at the point of entry for educators of all stripes. It almost makes me want to move my family to Scotland given the stark contrast with the English educational system. :-/
Filed under  //  SLF11  

Comments (4)

Sep 8 / 10:02am

#altc2011

(download)

 

Last year, at ALT-C 2010, I attempted to go to every session possible. I was exhausted by the end of the four days (I also attended a pre-conference session on Digital Literacies). This year, then, at ALT-C 2011 I decided to go to the other extreme. I focused on helping with manning the JISC stand and with having interesting and useful conversations with people I only usually get to interact with online. As I write this on the train on my way back home, I can happily report that this is a much more sustainable approach! 

There were two things I needed to be at ALT-C for. The first was the launch of JISC infoNet's Mobile Learning infoKit (alongside JISC's new Emerging Practice in a Digital Age guide). Due to the marketing freeze, this was less a launch and more 'having conversations with people who happened to be passing by'. The second was a session John Traxler invited me to co-lead on the critical reading of case studies. This went well, I think, as more delegates (around 40) than we thought attended the session and provided some thoughtful contributions. There are so many issues bound up in the notion of a 'case study' that really do need to need to be teased out and explored.

On Tuesday upon arriving at the conference I attended a session led by Frances Bell, Helen Keegan, Josie Fraser and Richard Hall. Although I couldn't stay for all of it as I needed to get back to the JISC stand, they (as you would expect) provided really thoughtful and interesting reflections on what 'being open' means in practice and some of the unexpected consequences (see her blog post). Helen's presentation on the way we 'force' students to be open (and the unintended consequences on their digital identities) was fascinating. It's definitely something I want to think through for myself.

After launching the Mobile Learning infoKit, I attended a session led by Sarah Knight, Clare Killen and Andy Ramsden on JISC's Emerging Practice in a Digital Age guide and then caught up with a range of people who I either don't see very often, or was meeting for the first time face-to-face. It was great to get to know Nicola and Frank from the Jorum team a bit better.

Wednesday morning at 10.50 was the time for my case studies workshop with John Traxler. The well-known and respected Andy Black was supposed to be part of this, but the Department for Education (his current employers) wouldn't let him out to play. After this, I was standing around the JISC stand commenting that "I'm sure there's somewhere I need to be right now." Sure enough, it was the much-anticipated 'Are we in Open Country?' session featuring David Kernohan, Amber Thomas, David White and Helen Beetham. I caught most of this and, as usual, the passion these people have both for Open Educational Resources and Open Practice shone through.

The majority of the rest of the day consisted of sponsor-related sessions, so after Steve Wheeler interviewed me for ALT Live Beta, I headed back to my hotel to prepare for the 'Conference Gala Buffet Dinner'. This turned out, in the event, to be the least buffet-like buffet I've ever seen. The food and company was good, but by the time it got to 22.10 (having sat down at 20.00) I wasn't confident dessert was going to arrive before 23.00! 

Thursday was a half-day in which I had long conversations with Amber Thomas, John Traxler and Jackie Carter and then attended John Naughton's keynote. The former were the kind of conversations we should be having about education and educational technology. Unfortunately, such free-form discussions tend not to have a natural 'home' in our usual working days. The latter, the keynote, was entertaining but nothing really new. Naughton used the music industry, newspapers and Wikipedia as examples of how technology and human collaboration can 'dissolve value chains'. It was all very Clay Shirky-esque.

The theme of ALT-C this year was 'Thriving in a colder and more challenging climate'. I certainly found the mood upbeat and people suggesting positive ways to deal with the economic situation and cultural situation in which we find ourselves. Next year's theme is 'A confrontation with reality' which, as David Kernohan pointed out, seems a bit of a capitulation. We co-create 'reality', after all...

 

Comments (0)

Jul 11 / 7:48pm

Academic Literacies Symposium

I arrived late, had to leave early, and missed the dinner and second day, but I nevertheless enjoyed my time at an Academic Literacies Symposium organised by today. There in a capacity as an 'expert' external to a proposed staff development programme, Day 1 was all about innovation, creativity and brainstorming. It was great to meet people enthusiastic about preparing students for the world will actually await them when they leave university, rather than the one that is often assumed.

We discussed all sorts of things, from power relations within the Higher Education sector to John Davitt's Random Activity Generator as a way of mixing things up and encouraging  diverse and creative thinking. Far too much to summarise here, but do take a look at the images above as part of what was captured!

Comments (0)

Jul 6 / 10:00am

Higher Education Academy Conference 2011 (#heaconf11)

P779

I'm used to accompanying my wife, and I've accompanied colleagues presenting at events, but this year's Higher Education Academy Conference (#heaconf11) is the first time I've been in the rather strange position of accompanying a poster to a conference. 

As with many conferences, there was a poster display (with an associated competition) at #heaconf11 which featured a poster co-created by JISC infoNet and Northumbria University (our host institution). The deal is that if you want  your poster displayed and judged, you have to have a representative there. I was that representative.

Still, it was a good opportunity to catch up with people I haven't seen for a while and meet new people. Lawrie Phipps is always good for a lengthy conversation and it's useful to catch up with other people within JISC, the Academy and other organisations have been getting up to.

One thing that remains woeful is the standard of presentations at conferences like this. It's simply not acceptable to read bullet points off slides, to have blatantly not practiced what you are going to say, and to run over allotted time slots. We can, and should, do better as a sector on this.

The highlight for me, other than the conversations I had around the JISC and JISC Advance stands, was the panel session this morning. Mike Baker, journalist and broadcaster for the BBC and (the now defunct TeachersTV) chaired a discussion about what the new Higher Education White Paper was likely to mean for the sector. Mercifully, he made short shrift of the long-winded pontifications by so-called questioners and kept the debate and ideas flowing.

It's a strange time in Higher Education and I think a lot of people are running scared. Universities, and the people in positions of authority within them, have been used to being in the driving seat. Now, for better or worse, students are the ones who are to collectively call the shots as consumers of learning. The trouble, and this is a topic too large for me to discuss at the end of this particular post, is that the rhetoric has shifted to the detriment of the worst-off in society. It's no longer 'widening participation', it's 'social mobility'; these are not synonyms.

So there we are: a less lavish Academy conference with, on the one hand, no change in the standard of presentations but, on the other, a chance to catch up with people who make a difference in the sector changing (often farcical) government proclamations into some kind of workable reality.

 

Comments (0)

May 27 / 1:38pm

Thinking Digital Conference 2011 (#tdc11)

Thinking Digital Conference 2011

It would take me all weekend to write up the Thinking Digital Conference I attended on Wednesday and Thursday this week. I use the word 'awesome' a lot, which means that I'm vocabularily (is that a word?) limited when I come across something mindblowing.

I was lost for words quite a few times during Thinking Digital. It was even better than last year's conference!

I've used Storify to curate tweets and photographs from others (a bit) and my own streams (mainly). Check it out!

 

[View the story "Thinking Digital Conference 2011" on Storify]

Filed under  //  Storify   conference   tdc11  

Comments (0)